How VXP and Daily Volume Caps Work
The fixed VXP rates, why perp notional scores at a tenth of spot, and how a daily volume cap splits your leaderboard into raw and counted volume.
VXP is the point unit every Voltrade competition scores in. Volume becomes VXP at a fixed rate, VXP becomes rank, and rank becomes a share of the pool. The rates are not editable by whoever created the competition, which is the point: a creator can choose the pool, the window and the caps, but not the exchange rate between your trading and your score.
The rates
| Competition type | Market | Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | Spot | 1 VXP per $1 traded |
| Volume | Perpetual | 0.1 VXP per $1 of notional |
| PnL | Any | 10 VXP per $1 of net realized profit, floored at 0 |
Three things follow from this table.
Perps are rated at a tenth of spot because leverage makes notional cheap to manufacture. $10,000 of margin at 10x produces $100,000 of notional. If both scored identically, the leaderboard would rank traders by leverage, and the winner would be whoever ran closest to liquidation. Pricing $10 of perp notional at $1 of spot does not remove the advantage of size — it removes the incentive to win by risk appetite alone.
PnL is rated upward, not downward. Ten VXP per dollar of realized profit reflects that profit is far harder to manufacture than turnover. A dollar of profit is worth a hundred times a dollar of perp notional, and it should be.
Losses floor at zero, they do not go negative. A losing day produces no points rather than subtracting points you already earned. Without the floor, a trader who qualified on Monday could be pushed back below a threshold on Friday by a single bad trade — which would punish continuing to trade, the opposite of what a competition is for.
A campaign can also carry a global points multiplier, which scales the result after the rate is applied. It scales everyone's score identically, so it changes the headline numbers on the leaderboard without changing anyone's relative position.
What "volume" actually means
Two details decide more outcomes than the rate does.
Register before you trade. Where counting begins depends on how the venue is tracked: from a cumulative counter, your baseline is taken at registration and anything earlier is invisible; from individual fills, volume is bucketed across the competition window. Registering costs nothing but a signature, so the correct move is always to register first and decide whether to compete afterwards.
Days are anchored to the competition's start time. A competition that starts at 14:00 UTC rolls its day at 14:00 UTC, every day, on every venue. Midnight is not a boundary. Every per-day rule — the cap, a daily lottery bar — uses that window.
Why caps exist
A competition without a cap has a structural problem: the largest account in the field wins it on the first day, and everyone else is competing for the remainder. That is technically fair and practically pointless, because it means the outcome was known before the competition started.
A daily volume cap fixes it by declaring how much volume can count per trader per day. Everything above the cap is still tracked and still displayed — it just does not score.
The mechanics are simple. If the cap is $500,000 and you trade $1.2M in a day, $500,000 counts, $700,000 does not, and your row is flagged as over the cap. Tomorrow the counter resets at the day boundary anchored to the competition start.
Some competitions cap points directly rather than volume. The effect is the same, and where both exist, whichever binds first is the one that matters. Points are floored to whole numbers when they are written, so a fractional remainder does not accumulate.
Raw volume versus counted volume
This is why leaderboards show two volume figures per trader, and why they frequently disagree.
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Raw / total volume | Everything you traded in scope, uncapped |
| Counted volume | The portion that converted into VXP |
Only the second number moves your rank. The first is displayed because hiding it would be worse — a trader who traded $2M and sees $500k on the board would reasonably conclude the tracking is broken. Showing both makes the cap visible as a rule rather than as a bug.
If your two numbers are equal, the cap is not binding on you and you can ignore it. If they diverge, every additional dollar you trade that day is pure cost.
How a cap changes optimal strategy
Without a cap, the strategy is trivial: trade more. With a cap, it inverts.
Spread, don't front-load. In a fourteen-day competition with a $500k daily cap, the maximum you can score is 14 × $500k of counted volume. A trader who does $500k every day beats a trader who did $5M on day one and nothing after, by a factor of nearly three — despite having traded less than half as much.
Stop when you hit it. Once your counted volume for the day equals the cap, additional volume earns nothing and costs fees. That is the clearest "stop trading" signal any competition gives you, and it is visible live on the leaderboard.
Re-check after the day rolls. The reset happens at the competition's anchored day boundary, not at midnight. If you are trading around the boundary, know where it is.
Caps compress the field. A cap makes the top of the leaderboard converge — many traders max out, and the differentiator becomes how many days you cleared it rather than how much you traded on any one. That is deliberate: it is what makes the contest about consistency.
Where caps interact with everything else
A cap is one of several filters between "you traded" and "you got paid". The others are qualifying minimums: a minimum counted volume, a minimum trade count, a minimum points total. A cap limits your upside; a minimum removes you entirely if you fall short.
The dangerous combination is a high minimum with a low cap, because it fixes how many days you have to be active. If the minimum is $2M of counted volume and the cap is $500k per day, you need at least four full days at the cap. Miss the window and no amount of size makes it up.
Projections handle these filters explicitly — a trader below any qualifying bar simply shows no projected reward. How projected rewards are calculated covers what each filter does to the number on the page.
Reading it live
Leaderboards are cron-refreshed snapshots, not live ticks. Competition leaderboards sync on a fixed schedule and challenge leaderboards on a tighter one, so a trade you just did will not appear instantly. The countdown on the page reflects the real sync schedule rather than a number chosen to look responsive.
When you check your row, read it in this order: counted volume against the cap, counted volume against the qualifying minimum, then rank. The third number is the one everyone looks at and the least actionable of the three.
Browse what is running on live competitions, compare venues on exchanges, or read the complete guide to trading competitions for the full evaluation checklist. If you would rather be scored on profit than turnover, challenges bracket volume instead of capping it.
Keep reading
- Crypto Trading Competitions: The Complete Guide
What crypto trading competitions are, how volume and PnL scoring differ, and how to read the rules of one before you spend a dollar chasing its prize pool.
- How Projected Rewards Are Calculated
The exact math behind a projected payout — pro-rata versus leaderboard tiers, the eligibility filters that zero you out, and why a projection shows a dash.
- Blofin Trading Competitions: How They Work
How Voltrade tracks Blofin competitions — UID linking through the affiliate API, 16:00 UTC day buckets, sub-invitee snapshot deltas, and what that means for you.
Every trade is a competition
Join a live volume competition or PnL challenge across top venues — or launch your own in minutes.